You’ve No Powers To Try Me At CCT – Onnoghen Tells Federal Government

The Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Walter Onnoghen, on Monday, tested the purview of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, CCT, sitting in Abuja, to attempt him over his supposed inability to announce his advantages.

Stay Connected And Informed! Follow Us On Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter

The CJN, who slowed down his arranged arraignment following his refusal to show up before the Justice Danladi Umar’s driven three-part board council, was anyway spoken to by a consortium of 89 attorneys that involved 46 Senior Advocates of Nigeria.

The lawful group, which was driven by a previous President of the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, and a previous Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN, told the council that their appearance at the procedure was “in dissent.”

Olanipekun told the court that the CJN has just documented a movement dated January 14, to challenge the ward of the council to hear the charges FG leveled against him.

“My ruler, we are not simply difficult purview, we are notwithstanding testing the ward of this court to try and sniff that charge. We have served the Complainant/Respondent”, Olanipekun submitted.

In spite of the fact that the said movement was not moved, by and by, an individual from the group who addressed Vanguard on state of namelessness, said the CJN would profit by FG’s inability to channel the appeal to against him, just as the result of the examination that was purportedly directed on his benefits announcement frames by the Code of Conduct Bureau, CCB, to the National Judicial Council, NJC, before it hurried the case to the CCT.

The CJN is battling that FG’s inability to submit to existing legal point of reference as exemplified in an ongoing Appeal Court’s choice in Nganjiwa v Federal Republic of Nigeria (2017) LPELR-43391(CA), such that any unfortunate behavior connected to the workplace and elements of a legal officer, should initially be accounted for to and dealt with by the NJC, as per the arrangements of the laws.

He contended that simply after the NJC has articulated against such legal officer could arraigning offices of the Federal Government continue to start a criminal continuing.

Subsequently, putting dependence on an ongoing choice of the CCT on a comparative charge FG held up against another Justice of the Supreme Court, Sylvester Ngwuta, the CJN’s legitimate group, kept up that FG’s choice to sideline the NJC, stripped the council of its purview to engage the moment case.

Share your story with us! Email


Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Most Popular

𝙈𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙮 𝙉𝙚𝙬𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙣𝙚𝙬𝙨, 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩, 𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙨, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙡𝙞𝙛𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙮𝙡𝙚 𝙪𝙥𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙖𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙. 𝙒𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚, 𝙪𝙥-𝙩𝙤-𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙚, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙖𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙠𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙥𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙙. 𝙁𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙪𝙨 𝙤𝙣 𝙨𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙢𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙖 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙪𝙥𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨.

𝗖𝗼𝗽𝘆𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 © 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟯 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘆 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀. 𝗔𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗱

To Top