Connect with us


I Wasn’t Aware Onnoghen Was Suspended Before I Was Sworn In, Says Muhammad




Stay Connected And Informed! Follow Us On Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter

President Muhammadu Buhari on Friday sworn-in Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Ibrahim Tanko Mohammed at the State House, Abuja

President Muhammadu Buhari on Friday sworn-in Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Ibrahim Tanko Mohammed at the State House, Abuja

Justice Tanko Muhammad has aforesaid that President Muhammadu Buhari doesn’t need the permission of the National Judicial Council (NJC) to use him as acting judge of African country (CJN). He to boot aforesaid he become now not aware CJN conductor Onnoghen was suspended before he (Tanko) become sworn in.

He aforesaid this whereas responding to a question by method of the NJC.

The question followed a petition by method of a collection, Centre for Justice and first step, that requested the NJC to strip him of his position as a justice of the Supreme Court for acceptive the position of acting CJN with out the council’s nod.

He stated: “In my respectful read, the National Judicial Council has no role to play within the appointment of Associate in Nursing acting judge of African country within the primary example, that’s to say on 1st appointment. The council comes in wherever the appointment as a result of the acting CJN is to be revived or extended. I humbly hash out with Section 231(4) of the 1999 Constitution.

“It become for the larger hobby of the judiciary and therefore the constitutionality that I usual to be sworn in as acting CJN with the conviction that if the order of Jan twenty three, 2019 is finally set apart, the celebrity quo can be reconditioned. however before it is put aside, there need to be no vacuum within the geographical point of the CJN and therefore the chairman of the NJC.”

He aforesaid similarly: “On Jan twenty five, 2019, I become summoned to the Aso Villa at the instance of the president. before the summons, I became not aware of the reality that the Code of Conduct assembly (CCT) created any order on Jan twenty three, 2019. what is more, past what I examine within the newspapers and watched on the tv, similar to each alternative Nigerian, I become not privileged to ascertain any of the processes filed by the parties before the assembly. Hence, i could not very acknowledge the profit or demerit of divergent positions.

“On the twenty fifth day of Jan, the president swore Maine in because the acting CJN and no longer as a result of the substantive CJN. Justice conductor Onnoghen stays the CJN till he is eliminated from geographical point according with the provision of the charter. he’s handiest suspended.”

Some jail practitioners but have disagreed with Tanko. Lagos-based completely attorney, Anthony Omaghomi, said: “I one by one suppose it’s miles a very lame defence. I discover it unacceptable. there is not any such distinction within the constitution.”

Abuja-primarily based mostly lawyer, Abubakar Sani, said: “Under the Interpretation Act, the president will handiest rent Associate in Nursing showing choose at the identical phrases as a substantial decide, this is often on the advice of the NJC and subject to the approval of the Senate.”

But the manager director, Socio-Economic Right and responsibility Project (SERAP), Adetokunbo Mumuni, control a divergent read. “It is as simple as that. it’s only if such appointment needs to be created substantial that the NJC can be involved,” he explicit .

Onnoghen within the meanwhile has alleged that agents of the national tampered together with his Assets Declaration Forms submitted to the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB).

He created the claim at his resumed trial the day before this at the CCT.

The aforesaid documents embody CCB Assets Declaration styles of 2014 and 2015.

The first prosecution witness, James Akpalla, a senior investigatory officer with the CCB, wanted to tender the explicit files in assist of his proof con to Onnoghen for the period of the day past’s complaints.

When the documents were tested to the litigator, however, Onnoghen, through his advocate, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, suggested the assembly that a careful look into them confirmed that they need been tampered with.

According to him, the 2014 form “has find yourself unfastened, a part of it mutilated and has become blue during a method.”

Awomolo aforesaid that an identical observation become created among the 2015 type with duplications and omissions of some pages. “We have some reservations on the files. we are going to now not item within the interest of justice however we’ve got reservations that may be addressed at the quit of the day,” he said.

Akpalla, in his proof in chief, told the assembly that the CCB on Jan ten referred a petition written through the Anti-Corruption and analysis info Initiative to his cluster for analysis.

The witness delivered that at the electricity of the petition signed by mistreatment one Chief Dennis Aghanya, he visited Onnoghen in his geographical point at the Supreme Court, whereby a cautionary announcement became noninheritable from him, whilst letters are to boot written to the quality leased Bank for account information of the litigator with the bank.

He additional control that the subsequent day, January 11, the bank replied, prompting the investigation cluster to conclude their enquiry and place along their document.

Under go examination, the witness abreast of the assembly that he did now not understand whether or not or not the CCB encompasses a vital register and register wherever back property forms square measure deposited and registered.

While responding to a different question, the witness suggested the assembly that analysis into the petition towards Onnoghen was all over within twenty four hours.

Drama however ensued once Awomolo confronted the witness with the charge con to Onnoghen, proof of proof, list of reveals and witnesses, that were all dated Jan ten, whereas analysis into the petition had now not been finished.

Also, while the witness tried to deny the involvement of the Economic and monetary Crimes Commission (EFCC) within the CCB analysis, Awomolo sweet-faced him with however the other set of files from normal leased Bank addressed to the EFCC but tendered by method of the witness.

At this issue, the witness explicit he become no longer aware that the expenses towards Onnoghen were filed before the of completion of the analysis and consequently declined equally feedback on the monetary institution’s report addressed to the EFCC.

In the route of the proceedings, the petition con to Onnoghen, files from his bank, his cautionary assertion and therefore the 2 assets announcement work he once submitted to the CCB had been admitted as reveals through the assembly.

Meanwhile, paying attention to on the matter has been adjourned till March twenty one.

It is foreseen that thereon adjourned date, the account officer to Onnoghen, already summoned via the assembly, can seem in relevancy the files submitted to the CCB.

Prosecution advocate, Aliyu Umar, had earlier requested the court to subpoena the bank respectable when Awomolo had adverse tendering the establishment record on the ground that as a result of the witness didn’t creator or sign the file, he couldn’t swish it as Associate in Nursing exhibit before the assembly.

Share your story with us! Email


I have a passion for blogging about what's trending in Hip-Hop, politics and entertainment. I'm a huge Hip-hop fan; my favorite artiste are Chris Brown, Jay'z & Beyonce. I also enjoy spending time with my team (#TeamWE), and working hard as hard work pays off.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply


𝗖𝗼𝗽𝘆𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 © 𝟮𝟬𝟮4 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘆 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀. 𝗔𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗱. 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘆𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗲𝗯𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲.